Navigation
Motto

 

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up."

Arthur Koestler 

Entries in Politics (401)

Tuesday
Apr152014

Syria Chemical Weapons? 

Have you heard about this story? It is from December 2013 and onkly gets airtime on alternative stations like Democracy Now. 

Monday
Apr142014

Another Paul Craig Roberts Interview

Sunday
Apr132014

A Tale of Two Jokes

I remember a joke from the seventies, when computers were mystical wonderful things.

The American President and the Russian Premier were having an argument about who would win the Cold War. So they consulted the world's biggest computer. After all the relevant data was entered, the computer spinned and whirled and lights flashed. Then the printout said, " In 50 years American will be a socialist nation." The Russian Premier chuckled. 

The American president then said, "Well, let's see what the computer says about Russia." After all the relevant data was entered the computer spinned and whirled and lights flashed. The American President looked at the printout, frowned, and said, "I can't understand it, it is all in Chinese."

There are a lot of ironies in the joke. America "won" the Cold War, yet it can be argued that America is today a socialist nation. I would argue that fascist is a better adjective. China, while currently in a bit of a funk, "is doing quite well, thank you very much." In some ways Russia is more capitalistic than the US, but neither is a capitalist country as both are oligarchies.

These days a joke is "making the rounds" among Russian speakers.

Obama and Putin have an argument. They decide to go to a fortune teller to settle it. They ask, "Will there be war?" The fortune teller deals the cards and pronounces that there will be war. Obama does not seem concerned. He asks the fortune teller about inflation. He asks, "What will be the inflation rate? For example, what will a hot dog cost in ten years?" The gypsy deals the cards and pronounces the judgment of the cards. "A hot dog will cost 30 Rubles," she says.

My point is that Russia is being played and propagandized, maybe self-propagandized, by its humor. No surprise here. All governments and cultures do the same. 

The last few of America's wars have not been against countries that could fight back. It is not clear what will happen. While a Russian victory seems unlikely, so does an American victory. Yet America seems to "hell bent" on war as well. Listen to the propaganda on American nightly news. What will happen if there is conflict? I doubt it will be a "shooting war." But it will instead be asymmetrical—sanctions and such. How will the individual members of NATO respond, countries like Poland that gets most of its natural gas from Russia? Or consider Germany that gets 30%. This gas will be impossible to replace for decades, and the price will double even if they can replace it.

The American response? Obama reinforces the American Pacific Fleet to "piss off" China.

Hubris.

Wiki:

Hubris means extreme pride or self-confidence. Hubris often indicates a loss of contact with reality and an overestimation of one's own competence, accomplishments or capabilities, especially when the person exhibiting it is in a position of power.

Wednesday
Apr022014

Paul Craig Roberts

For an important Paul Craig Roberts interview. Click here. Instead of watching mindless news about a missing airplane, listen to this. 

Tuesday
Apr012014

Failure

 

Being on a trip has allowed me to do things that I normally do not do, like going to McDonalds. No, I will not be talking about the evils of that restaurant. I do not come to eat, I come for the WiFi and the endless $1 iced tea. Instead I want to talk about the local newspaper that McDonalds provided.

The headline was that local healthcare businesses were going to lay off people. Shocking. Of course it was not mentioned that healthcare in America is a giant sink hole of disaster. The paper proposed that this layoff was the fault of the legislature which had "failed" to pass the extension of Medicaid required to fill in gaps in ObamaCare.

Two points I think are important. The first is that the article was not an editorial. Thus the article had the pretense of objectivity. Notice also the use of the word "failure." A loaded word that was designed to show that the Missouri had "failed." No, the Republicans had decided that to expand Medicare was a bad idea, they had not failed. Of course they could have been "dead wrong." My observation is not that there is a correct choice, I don't care about such things much anymore. It is that more and more the media is not even pretending to pay homage to the myth of objective journalism.

Never forget that you are being played. Never trust anything you read, see, or hear in the media. Of course you can trust me! No, you can't trust me either. I am just as biased as anyone else. As unlikely as it is, I could be wrong. The solution is to seek out books and articles you disagree with. Read them. Do not read the same old sources that already agree with your preconceived notions. Expand your horizons beyond the "usual suspects." Read critically. I doubt that most readers noticed the use of the pejorative word "failed." Be the person that notices such things.

Never forget that you are being played